Bard PowerPort Litigation: What Cancer Survivors Need to Know About Defective Port Catheters
Understanding the Growing Crisis
If you or a loved one underwent chemotherapy or other intravenous treatments and had a Bard PowerPort implanted, you may be entitled to significant compensation. As of January 2026, over 2,545 active lawsuits have been filed against Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) and its subsidiary Bard Access Systems, alleging that defective port catheter devices have caused serious, sometimes life-threatening injuries to cancer survivors and other patients.
At Carmichael Law Group, we understand the profound impact these complications have had on patients who were already facing challenging medical conditions. Our experienced product liability attorneys are committed to holding manufacturers accountable and securing justice for those harmed by defective medical devices.
What Is a Bard PowerPort?
The Bard PowerPort is an implantable port catheter system surgically placed beneath the skin to provide easy vascular access for delivering chemotherapy, contrast imaging agents, or other long-term intravenous medications. Also known as a totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD), port-a-cath, or central venous catheter, these devices were marketed as safe, convenient alternatives to repeated needle sticks for patients requiring extended treatment.
Approximately 400,000 port catheters are implanted annually in the United States, with Bard commanding roughly 75% of the market. The devices consist of a small reservoir (port body) connected to a flexible catheter that threads into a major vein near the heart. While these devices should improve patient comfort and treatment efficiency, mounting evidence suggests that Bard's PowerPort models suffer from fundamental design defects.
The Alarming Defects: What Makes Bard PowerPorts Dangerous?
Catheter Surface Roughness
The core alleged defect involves the catheter's surface integrity. Unlike properly manufactured catheters with smooth surfaces, Bard PowerPort catheters exhibit significant roughness at the microscopic level. This roughness stems from several manufacturing and design failures:
Barium Sulfate Degradation: The catheters contain barium sulfate to make them visible on X-rays and CT scans. However, this compound disassociates and degrades over time, creating surface irregularities that promote bacterial adhesion and blood clot formation.
Inadequate Coating: Bard failed to incorporate protective sheaths or coatings that could prevent surface degradation and maintain the smooth surface critical for catheter safety.
Material Deficiencies: Whether constructed from polyurethane (ChronoFlex) or silicone (Groshong and Hickman types), the base materials themselves exhibit roughness that worsens as the device remains implanted.
The Devastating Health Consequences
This seemingly minor surface defect triggers a cascade of serious medical complications:
1. Catheter Fracture
The rough, degraded surface weakens catheter structural integrity, causing the device to break apart while inside the body. Catheter fragments can migrate through the bloodstream to vital organs, including the heart and lungs, requiring emergency surgical intervention. Studies indicate fractures typically occur between three months and three years after implantation—a timeline suggesting progressive material failure rather than surgical error.
2. Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSI/CLABSI)
Surface roughness provides an ideal environment for bacterial colonization. Bacteria attach to the irregular surface, forming biofilms that protect them from antibiotics and the immune system. These infections can progress rapidly, causing:
- Sepsis and septic shock
- Endocarditis (heart valve infection)
- Extended hospitalizations
- Need for device removal and replacement
- In severe cases, death
Research published in medical journals reveals that central line-associated bloodstream infections account for between 84,000 and 204,000 infections annually, resulting in up to 25,000 preventable deaths at an estimated cost of up to $21 billion per year.
3. Thrombosis (Blood Clots)
The catheter's rough surface disrupts normal blood flow and activates clotting factors. Patients develop dangerous blood clots (deep vein thrombosis) that can:
- Block the catheter, rendering it useless
- Extend into major vessels, causing superior vena cava syndrome
- Break loose and travel to the lungs (pulmonary embolism)
- Necessitate long-term anticoagulation therapy with its own risks
One comprehensive study found an overall complication rate of 59% for implanted port catheters, including thrombovascular complications in 36.8% of patients, infections in 17.9%, and mechanical complications in 10.3%.
Don’t risk forfeiting your rights. Call (334) 487-8475 or reach out online to schedule your free consultation and learn about your options.
This is what sets our team apart
Here's What Sets Our Team Apart
Carmichael Law Group guides you every step of the way, from applications to appeals, with clear communication and strategic advocacy.
-
Compassionate Advocates
We treat every client with respect, empathy, and personalized attention, guiding you through the SSD process with care.
-
Proven Track Record
With years of experience and thousands of successful cases, we provide skilled representation at every stage of your claim.
-
Honest GuidanceWe prioritize clear communication, ethical advocacy, and transparency, ensuring you understand your rights and options.
-
Focused on Results
We fight tirelessly to secure the benefits you deserve, using strategic legal expertise to achieve the best possible outcome.
Current Status of the Litigation: MDL No. 3081
Federal Multidistrict Litigation
On August 8, 2023, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all federal Bard PowerPort cases into MDL No. 3081, centralizing them in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona under Judge David G. Campbell. This consolidation streamlines pretrial proceedings, discovery, and case management while preserving each plaintiff's individual claim.
Judge Campbell, who previously presided over the Bard IVC filter litigation involving over 8,000 claims, brings valuable experience to this complex medical device litigation.
Current Case Numbers and Growth
The litigation has experienced dramatic growth:
- January 2026: 2,545 active cases (2,694 total filed)
- November 2025: Added 336 new cases in a single month
- October 2025: Added 155 new cases
- The MDL has more than doubled in size over the past year
This exponential growth reflects increasing awareness of the devices' dangers and the willingness of injured patients to seek justice.
Key Litigation Timeline
General Discovery: Closed Case-Specific Discovery: Closed March 14, 2025: Plaintiff general expert reports submitted; defense rebuttals in progress May 12, 2025: Six bellwether cases selected for trial preparation Fall/Winter 2025: Summary judgment and Daubert motions (challenging expert testimony admissibility) March 2, 2026: First bellwether trial scheduled to begin March-December 2026: Six bellwether trials addressing fracture, infection, and thrombosis injuries
Bellwether Trials: Critical Inflection Point
Bellwether trials serve as test cases representing the broader litigation. Their outcomes provide both sides with crucial information about:
- How juries evaluate the evidence
- The strength of causation arguments
- Potential verdict ranges
- Whether settlement negotiations should commence
The six selected cases encompass the primary injury types—fractures, infections, and thrombosis—ensuring comprehensive evaluation of liability across different complication categories.
What Plaintiffs Are Alleging
The lawsuits against Becton, Dickinson and Company and Bard Access Systems assert multiple legal theories:
Design Defect
The PowerPort catheter design is inherently dangerous and unreasonably unsafe. Alternative, safer designs existed but were not implemented.
Manufacturing Defect
The manufacturing process produces catheters with surface irregularities and material degradation that deviate from design specifications.
Failure to Warn
Despite knowing about the elevated risks of fracture, infection, and thrombosis, Bard failed to adequately warn physicians and patients about these dangers. Product labeling and instructions for use did not reflect the true risk profile.
Negligence
Bard failed to:
- Conduct adequate pre-market testing
- Perform appropriate post-market surveillance
- Investigate adverse event reports
- Implement design improvements despite mounting evidence of problems
- Issue recalls or safety warnings
Breach of Warranty
The devices failed to perform as warranted, both expressly and impliedly, for their intended purpose.
Who Qualifies for a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?
You may be eligible to file a claim if:
✓ You received a Bard PowerPort implant (not a PICC line) ✓ You developed complications including:
- Catheter fracture or breakage
- Catheter migration
- Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI/CLABSI)
- Thrombosis or blood clots
- Need for revision surgery or device removal
- Related hospitalizations or medical treatment
✓ Your complications occurred within the relevant timeframe:
- Fractures: Ideally 3 months to 3 years post-implantation
- Infections: Ideally 30 days to 3 years post-implantation (must be catheter-related, not surgical site infection)
- Thrombosis: Ideally 3+ months post-implantation
Conservative Eligibility Criteria
The strongest cases typically involve:
- Bard IPC models (25 models identified in litigation, including PowerPort, BardPort, M.R.I., VUE, and X-Port series)
- No use for nutrition (TPN—total parenteral nutrition—complicates causation)
- No patient access or illicit drug use through the port
- No pre-existing hypercoagulable conditions for thrombosis claims
- Clear documentation of the device model and complications in medical records
Your health matters. Call (888) 687-6022 or contact us online today to schedule your free consultation.